Plaintiff alleges nail design company’s website violates ADA due to inaccessibility

U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
0Comments

In a landmark case highlighting the ongoing struggle for digital accessibility, a visually impaired individual has filed a lawsuit against a nail design company, alleging that its website is not accessible to blind and visually impaired users. The complaint was filed by Sumaya Hussein in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois on February 3, 2026, targeting Glam And Glits Nail Design, Inc.

The plaintiff, Sumaya Hussein, who is legally blind and relies on screen-reading software to navigate websites, claims that Glam And Glits Nail Design’s website is riddled with barriers that prevent her and others like her from accessing its services. According to the complaint, these barriers include missing alternative text for images, inaccessible forms, and navigation elements that cannot be operated using a keyboard alone. Hussein argues that these issues violate the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which mandates equal access to public accommodations for individuals with disabilities.

Hussein’s lawsuit seeks to address what she describes as “intentional discrimination” by Glam And Glits Nail Design. She asserts that despite the availability of accessible technology widely used by other companies, the defendant has failed to implement necessary changes to make its website usable for visually impaired individuals. “Defendant’s denial of full and equal access to its Website…is a violation of Hussein’s rights under the ADA,” states the complaint.

The plaintiff is requesting a permanent injunction requiring Glam And Glits Nail Design to modify its website policies and practices to ensure accessibility for blind and visually impaired consumers. Additionally, Hussein seeks compensatory damages for herself and other class members who have faced similar discrimination. The lawsuit also calls for certification as a class action under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 23(a) & (b)(2) or (b)(3), aiming to represent all legally blind individuals in the United States who have been denied access due to these barriers.

Representing Hussein in this legal battle is Alison Chan from Equal Access Law Group, PLLC. The case has been assigned Case No.: 1:26-cv-1214 in front of an unnamed judge at this stage.

Source: 126cv01214_Sumaya_Hussein_v_Glam_and_Glits_Complaint_Northern_District_of_Illinois.pdf


Related

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois

Former assistant principal accuses Chicago Board of Education of discrimination and retaliation

A former assistant principal has filed a lawsuit against the Board of Education of the City of Chicago, alleging discrimination and retaliation based on her race, religion, and sex.

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois

Legally blind consumers sue BudhaGirl jewelry company for inaccessible website under ADA

Two legally blind individuals have filed a lawsuit against BudhaGirl, LLC, alleging that the company’s website is not accessible to people with visual disabilities.

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois

Former department supervisor sues Lowe’s Home Centers for alleged disability discrimination and retaliation

A former department supervisor has filed a lawsuit against Lowe’s Home Centers, alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Trending

The Weekly Newsletter

Sign-up for the Weekly Newsletter from Illinois Courts Daily.